← All Ask Blue stories

What · Pulse

EJ Pearl

What changed in GIA’s pearl nacre classification?

GIA replaced its older Acceptable/Unacceptable nacre description with a five-level scale. Here is what Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor actually describe.

Close-up of luminous baroque pearls showing varied nacre surfaces and lustre
Photo · Alexey Demidov / Unsplash ↗
01

The change is a classification change, not a new pearl species

GIA’s former nacre result used the broad terms Acceptable and Unacceptable. The current scale uses five ranges—Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor—so reports can describe nacre quality with more resolution.

GIA says most pearls that would previously have met expected commercial quality are likely to fall in the Good range. That makes Good a normal classification, not a disguised warning.

02

What the new nacre scale is looking at

The scale examines structural or textural features at the surface and sub-surface that indicate how continuously nacre formed during growth. GIA also considers post-harvest condition, including wear or damage, alongside trade expectations for thickness.

That distinction matters: nacre condition and continuity are not identical to a direct measurement of nacre thickness. GIA offers average nacre thickness as a separate add-on service for eligible bead-cultured pearls.

  • Excellent → least eye-visible nacre variation in the scale
  • Good → expected to be common among commercial-quality submissions
  • Poor → features or condition that can raise durability concerns
03

How to use the result when buying

Read nacre beside the other six GIA Pearl Value Factors: size, shape, colour, lustre, surface and matching. A single factor does not turn a report into a price certificate.

For a purchase, keep the laboratory description separate from the seller’s price, return terms, metal quality and provenance claims. The report describes the submitted pearl; the commercial decision still belongs to the buyer.

Before you decide

Keep these five things with you.

  1. 01Confirm which GIA pearl report you are reading
  2. 02Read nacre as one of seven quality factors
  3. 03Do not translate Good into ‘second best’
  4. 04Separate nacre quality from thickness measurement
  5. 05Keep report facts separate from seller pricing

How this story earns trust

Sources, method and relationship—visible.

Each reference is tagged by the geography and authority of the source. Country-specific evidence is never presented as a global rule.

Method

This Pulse article uses GIA’s May 2025 announcement, its technical Gems & Gemology update and current pearl-report service pages. It distinguishes GIA’s laboratory terminology from Eight June interpretation.

Commercial relationship

Independent editorial. GIA and pearl sellers did not pay for inclusion.

Correction or improvement

Found a mistake, a missing perspective or a source we should review? Send it to the editorial desk ↗

  1. 01
    GlobalGemological authority
    Expanded nacre scale to all pearl classification reports ↗

    Gemological Institute of America (GIA). GIA’s 19 May 2025 announcement of the five-range nacre scale.

  2. 02
    GlobalTechnical research
    GIA 7 Pearl Value Factors: An Update on Nacre Classification ↗

    GIA Gems & Gemology. Technical explanation of continuity, surface and sub-surface features used in the updated scale.

Useful questions

Quick answers,
kept specific.

Does a Good nacre grade mean a pearl is low quality?

Not by itself. GIA says the majority of pearls submitted under the updated system are expected to be classified Good rather than the older Acceptable designation.

Is the nacre grade the same as nacre thickness?

No. The current classification describes nacre continuity and condition; average nacre thickness is a separate GIA add-on service for eligible bead-cultured pearls.